Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

January 23 2015

bouh
c-cassandra: my hair and i have a very complicated relationship </3
Reposted fromthatsridicarus thatsridicarus viacomics comics

August 02 2014

bouh

baby chimp

















The recent release of “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" reminded me of one of my favorite ape vs. man films – this 1932 video that shows a baby chimpanzee and a baby human undergoing the same basic psychological tests.

Its gets weirder – the human baby (Donald) and the chimpanzee baby (Gua) were both raised as humans by their biological/adopted father Winthrop Niles Kellogg.  Kellogg was a comparative psychologist fascinated by the interplay between nature and nurture, and he devised a fascinating (and questionably ethical) experiment to study it:

Suppose an anthropoid were taken into a typical human family at the day of birth and reared as a child. Suppose he were fed upon a bottle, clothed, washed, bathed, fondled, and given a characteristically human environment; that he were spoken to like the human infant from the moment of parturition; that he had an adopted human mother and an adopted human father.

First, Kellogg had to convince his pregnant wife he wasn’t crazy:

 …the enthusiasm of one of us met with so much resistance from the other that it appeared likely we could never come to an agreement upon whether or not we should even attempt such an undertaking.

She apparently gave in, because Donald and Gua were raised, for nine months, as brother and sister. Much like Caesar in the “Planet of the Apes” movies, Gua developed faster than her “brother,” and often outperformed him in tasks. But she soon hit a cognitive wall, and the experiment came to an end. (Probably for the best, as Donald had begun to speak chimpanzee.)

You can read more about Kellogg’s experiment, its legacy, and public reaction to it here.

Reposted fromdarksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon viaTabsla Tabsla
bouh
0279 b3ef 500
Reposted fromnimble nimble viaTabsla Tabsla
bouh
2918 2f73
Reposted fromkwestia-gustu kwestia-gustu viatrublood trublood
bouh
bouh
4983 d556 500
Beware ! Showing this map could be considered as anti semitic
Reposted fromJamalus Jamalus viaTabsla Tabsla

May 27 2014

3406 8454 500

incidentalcomics:

Conflict in Literature

Reposted fromcumberkruemel cumberkruemel viatrublood trublood
bouh
Reposted fromsogib sogib viaTabsla Tabsla
bouh
2043 fe75

kendrawcandraw:

Stop sexualizing my body stop shaming my body stop policing my body

orihime-strawberry-love:

BREASTS ARE SEXUAL ORGANS

BREASTS ARE SEXUAL ORGANS

BREAST ARE SEXUAL ORGANS

BREASTS ARE FUCKING SEXUAL ORGANS!!

WE DONT LET MEN WALK AROUND WITH THEIR DICKS OUT BECAUSE ITS A SEXUAL ORGAN!!

GET THE FUCK OVER IT YOUR FEMALE BREASTS ARE

  • SEXUAL
  • FUCKING
  • ORGANS!!!

source: X

tazzygal:

Ahem.

BREASTS ARE NOT SEXUAL ORGANS YOU INCONSIDERATE DICK!

Breasts are mammary organs, meaning their true and primary purpose is to nurse babies.

I’ll repeat that for the slow people in the class, you warthog-faced buffoon.

Breasts are mammary sacks. They are meant to feed babies, just like a cow’s udder. They aren’t sexual organs. They aren’t classified as such in biology texts (certainly none of the ones I checked out to answer this post)

Men have breasts, you pile of refuse. Their breasts are smaller than women’s, but they possess the same mammary glands and, properly stimulated, can produce milk. Men can get breast cancer. They can develop larger breasts due to excessive hormones. Their breasts are exactly like a women’s breast, except that since their testicles produce testosterone in high degree, they don’t have enough female hormones in their bodies to start lactating.

So, you pile of putrescence, you’re probably thinking, “If breasts aren’t sex organs then how come guys get horny looking at them and women get turned on by playing worth them, huh?”

The answers to both are so terribly simple that you might just be able to follow them if you pay attention, pig.

Men are enticed by breasts because they’re not allowed to see them. Women are sensitive because stimulation triggers two responses - bonding hormones and lactation.

In case you’re too simple to get this, I’ll break it down further for you. In cultures where breasts are viewed daily, they don’t do much to get a guy hot and bothered. There are hundreds of paintings from the renaissance period and earlier depicting women nursing babies, especially images of the Blessed Virgin nursing Christ, and none of these have ever been considered provocative, because that’s what boobs are for. Meanwhile, in cultures where everyone from baby sister to great-great grandma walk around topless because the weather will kill them otherwise, dudes don’t get raging erections every time they see a breast. They don’t find boobs enticing the way men do in America, where boobs are considered shameful and need to be hidden.

As for women getting aroused by their boobs being played with, you brainless donkey, a woman’s body responds to get nipples bring touched by flooding her body with bonding hormones that help her attach to get babies - you know, the people her breasts are actually supposed to be used by - and hormones that get her glands making milk. Also, please note that many women with large breasts don’t feel any stimulation when fondled, meaning they aren’t sensitive enough to get off on having their boobs played with.

Do me a favor and GET THE FUCK OVER YOURSELF YOU PURITANICAL ASS! My breasts are NOT SEXUAL ORGANS. They are lactation organs designed for my use and my baby’s use. Not for any man’s use or pleasure.

You inconsiderate space herpe.

micro-mochi:

Can I point out that male nipples also belonged to mammary organs necessary to nurse babies? 

Reposting just for the second last comment \m/
Reposted fromthatsridicarus thatsridicarus viacomics comics
bouh
2259 80ff 500

not-with-your-wallet:

'My people'

Reposted fromthatsridicarus thatsridicarus viaTabsla Tabsla

May 22 2014

bouh
5631 8685
tak właśnie!
Reposted fromcontradiction contradiction viatrublood trublood
bouh
9442 236d
Reposted fromosobliwosci osobliwosci viaTabsla Tabsla

May 20 2014

bouh
5408 0b7b
Reposted fromkjuik kjuik viaTabsla Tabsla
bouh
5119 8dba
Reposted fromTabsla Tabsla
bouh
Reposted fromcarfreitag carfreitag viaTabsla Tabsla

May 06 2014

bouh

hugtherobots:

I know it’s trendy to fight the system and cry that we are all becoming slaves of technology, but this attitude overlooks that computers and phones are tools for communicating. When someone thinks I’m an idiot smiling at a machine, I’m actually smiling at my girlfriend who is 10000 miles away and whom I would have never met if not for these newfangled electronics. As they say: when the wise man points to the moon, the fool looks at the finger.

This is a topic that I’ve been wanting to tackle for a while now; much credit to this excellent post for bringing it to the front of my brain.

Reposted fromthatsridicarus thatsridicarus viacomics comics

April 30 2014

bouh
5117 583a
Reposted fromkjn kjn viagameofthrones gameofthrones

April 29 2014

bouh
6703 681b
Reposted fromollardo ollardo viatrublood trublood
bouh

April 14 2014

bouh
3997 2fee 500
Reposted fromTLC2 TLC2 viaTabsla Tabsla
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl